When an argument breaks out between an officer and a committee member, what should you do?

Remaining neutral and observing the situation is essential in a conflict between an officer and a committee member for several reasons. First, neutrality helps maintain a professional environment and ensures that any underlying issues can be resolved without bias. Taking sides can escalate tensions and lead to further conflicts, as it may be perceived as favoritism or a betrayal of trust.

By staying neutral, you also position yourself as an observer rather than a participant in the argument, which allows you to gather more information about the dispute. This perspective is beneficial if the situation needs to be addressed later by a leader or if mediation becomes necessary. Instead of adding fuel to the fire, your objective stance supports a more rational approach to conflict resolution.

In situations where emotions run high, it is essential to give all parties space to voice their opinions without feeling judged or attacked. Remaining neutral allows for clarity and can help diffuse the situation, as neither party may feel threatened by a perceived alliance, fostering a more open dialogue for resolution.